User survey: intermediate results

Last week I started a small survey about which approach to manifest generation is more popular. The survey is still open for participation, so if you have not yet cast your vote, this would be the time to do it. The results so far:

• 88% do code first, while only 12% do manifest first.
• Top reasons for doing manifest first are: more control over the manifest, and IDE support showing non-available classes.
• Nearly all people who do code first think that a tool will do a better job creating a manifest than they would.
• Code first is also seen as less error-prone and faster to work with.

The final question provided somewhat puzzling results:

• Most of the comments suggested that it would not be a good idea to promote manifest first as it would encourage users to produce broken manifests.
• Yet again 40% voted for an improved manifest first support.

So the results are somewhat inconclusive. I was actually thinking about ditching manifest first support in Osmorc, yet it still seems to be a requested feature, apparently even by those who use the code-first approach. Then again only 17 people participated so far so deriving a trend from that would be premature.

Bottom line - I need more input. So if you haven’t done the survey yet, please do - it’s only 4 questions and probably done in a minute.